DWR what the hell

You may not fish at waters that have a
specific bag or size limit if you possess fish
in violation of that limit. For example, if the
cutthroat trout limit at a river you’d like to
fish is two cutthroats, and you harvested
three cutthroats earlier that day at another
water, you can’t fish at that river until you
consume or donate at least one of the cut-
throats you harvested earlier.

Copied from the 2009 Utah Fishing Guidebook, aka Proclamation.

In the example above there is no mention of not being able to fish while you are in possession of a limit of fish. It implied that you can fish at that river while in possession of a limit of cutthroat trout. But you cannot fish there while in possession of a fish which would exceed the limit. If you were to fish the river in the example above, you would have to release all cutthroat trout that you caught.

In fact, the electronic copy of last year’s guide book had the example of already being in possession of two cutthroats, and not being able to fish the river. I pointed out that being in possession of two cutthroat trout on a river that has a limit of two cutthroat trout is not a violation of that limit. It is in compliance of said limit. It was changed (corrected) prior to printing.

I am sure glad that this forum was created. You all give good advice and help me better understand what the dwr is thinking. I guess fishing for the walleye and pike first is what I will do. Thanks to all that replied

“consume or donate at least one of the cut-
throats you harvested earlier.”

When you say “donate” does that mean your able to give a fellow fisherman who’s not having any luck a fish or two ???

You need to read the proclamation more carefully. You will see that is says daily bag and possession limits. You cannot just catch, eat, and catch again if you are in violation of the daily bag and possession limits. Taking a limit home and freezing it would still be possession. [fishin]

No, that is illegal. You must be at your place of residence or theirs(OR)fill out the appropriate document for donation. It is all in the Guidebook for proper procedure on that.[;)]

thanks for that post dangler Bang![bobbeaten] it kinda hurts I DID READ the proclamation. Very carefully, always do. If I have a question keep it in my truck. As I said earlier I rarely keep fish and some of the newer laws sparked some serious questions for me. I understand them and am not arguing with them they are their for a reason right? But it is still a grey area that needed to be talked about for a few of us people who are very specific. I am not just blindly going out and eating fish without knowing the regulations on the fishery. I really would rather have a steak anyway. I think its always better to ask, even if seems like to some that I have no clue because i will humbly state that I will never know everything about everything.

                                                                        NOBODY WILL

cheers

I agree FOD this is good stuff I’ve read the proc a few times but actually interpreting what the actual state law is sometime confusing. When it comes to trout im usually a C&R guy I rarely take more than I can eat 1 or 2 but clearing up these gray areas is awesome If more people new the law better I think our fisheries would be even better !!! [;)]

example question: If the perch in the freezer are fillets intended for bait. you dont use the bait? because your taking it back out with you? Does that count as bag and possession still? (perch eyeballs included in the question) just a question.

Idea: start a 'Grey area" thread then maybe a warden or two will give some good information to help explain but that could also open up a can of worms.

example question: If the perch in the freezer are fillets intended for bait. you dont use the bait? because your taking it back out with you? Does that count as bag and possession still? (perch eyeballs included in the question) just a question.

:sunglasses:This discussion has gone all over the place, including quotes from the proclamation…some applicable and some not.


It is difficult for DWR to anticipate all of the interpretations to any specific wording they use to establish regulations on individual waters or species. In some cases, general regulations apply. On specific waters, the regulatations for those waters supercede general regulations.


The big “kicker” for the 10 perch limit on Yuba is that during the winter months…when perch are typically deeper…you MUST keep the first 10 you catch. No provision for catch and release…like there is during the rest of the year and on trout waters. If that MANDATORY KEEP law was not there, you could fish all day after you kept your 10 perch, and you could put the rest back in the water. The law is to prevent greedy anglers from killing a bunch of smaller fish by forcing them back down the hole even when there air bladder is protruding.


**I personally disagree with not only the 10 fish limit, but especially with the mandatory keeping of the first ten…even during the winter. True, many perch are caught from water over 40 feet deep during the winter at Yuba…beginning in November…not just starting in January. But, there are thousands of others that are taken in water as shallow as 10 to 12 feet. Perch taken from waters under 30 feet deep can usually power back down to the depths and survive. And, if a few don’t, it is not hurting the ecology of the lake. **


Based upon personal experience and reviewing the reports from many other anglers this winter, Yuba is not suffering from a perch shortage. There are lots of perch…all over the lake…and at all depths. At this point, the predator species are not overharvesting the perch…nor are anglers. Due to the proven cyclical nature of Yuba, we can expect it to suffer some kind of natural disaster within the next few years, and crash again. Happens about every 10 years. The perch…and all other species…will all die off and it will be back to starting over again. In the meantime, bajillions of perch will die of natural causes and cannot be caught by fishermen.


As Drew Cushing (Dir. of Warm Water Fisheries for DWR) has stated on numerous occasions…“You cannot stockpile fish”…or something to that effect. Having witnessed several of the cycles on Yuba over the years, I can attest that limits and management on perch have had little effect on the natural cycles and have not noticeably delayed or reduced the crashes when they occur.


**I have fished for perch in several states around the country. Almost universally, the best perch fishing is in waters that get lots of angler attention for perch, but which have no limits or foolish regulations. I have read on many websites that there are no perch lakes that have ever been overfished to the point of depletion. Angler pressure alone is not a key factor in the cycles of perch population boom and bust. **


Look instead at introductions(legal and illegal) of aggressive predators…like pike and muskies. Also, look at the manmade changes in water chemistry, water levels and in massive perch dieoffs due to drastic changes in both of these factors.


But, like most regulations made for our “benefit”, the current perch limits at Yuba are not likely to change. It takes years to get anything done…even if it is clearly needed. That limit will still be in effect even after the next crash…and there are no more perch left in the lake.


And, like most regulations, we don’t have to like it, but we do have to live with it.

that was a log post! I dont have a response except I am glad people like you really care and have done their homework. I know a little about lakes populations crashing and booming all the mountains that have 100s of lakes in them like the Uintas,Boulder,even the Beartooths in Montana have that problem that when the brookies take over. on any given lake if you hike in and catch a couple of small fish thats most likely the majority of what is in the lake. and if you find a lake that has big fish it has a better balance with the brookies that tend be more the main predators of the lake. they need a good balance and without having good plan they could all just go to crap. I do not disagree with any laws.

bigtbaggage–
When I first heard of these regulations on perch at Yuba, I was also confused as to what the DWR’s motivation is for this. However, the more I talked to others and thought about it, the more it made sense.

As others have stated, the mortality level of perch when caught is usually very high. I’m sure the DWR has done studies that show that between January 30th and March 1st, the mortality level for perch is probably at its highest point of the year if caught and released. Therefore, even though they have no problem with you keeping your limit, they do not want you to release any perch after your limit is reached. As you already stated, there is always a chance of catching some perch while fishing for pike or walleye, so better safe than sorry.

A good idea would be to catch 7 or 8 perch, and then try for walleye or pike. That way, if you catch a perch or two, you are still ok. Either that, or start the day off by fishing for pike or walleye. In my opinion, the regulations during that timespan is only a problem if you make it one.

Hope that helps.

2fishon wrote:
[/quote]
**You can catch perch all day long and turn them loose. You can also keep ten perch and continue to fish for walleye or northerns, releasing or culling any perch that you catch.
[/quote]
**

This is not true. If you keep a limit of any fish species on a given water, you legally can keep fishing for other species. However, if you catch another fish of that species while you have a limit in your possession, you are over the limit and will be cited. Even if that fish is in your hand for only a minute while you unhook and release it you are in violation of over limit. They will ticket you for this. I just confirmed this with a DWR lieutenant five minutes ago.

.

Now we have a problem. Someone asked them yesterday and they said it was perfectly legal and now you put this up? I am going to copy and print this post to give to the DWR if i ever get cited for this. They need to get all their apples in one basket.

:sunglasses:Again, the kicker is the mandatory keep law. You must keep the first ten you catch on Yuba…and may not keep fishing once you have that ten. If you catch another you will be in violation either for keeping or releasing the next fish.


On lakes that merely have a possession limit…or a slot limit…you can keep a limit and keep fishing…as long as you release all other fish of that species that you catch. It apparently matters not that the fish dies through poor handling, hook damage, depth and pressure changes or whatever. Just look at all the floaters on Strawberry to see how that works.

If this were true there would never be another bass fishing tournament in Utah. It’s called culling.

:sunglasses:Bass and some other “warm water” species may be kept in a live well and “culled”. However, if you read the proclamation carefully, you will note that trout may not be released once they have been put on a stringer or in a live well.


Once again, the reference was to the special regulations for perch on Yuba…not statewide for all species.

I agree with you. Trout cannot be culled, they cannot be held and then released. This applies only to warm water fish. This poor thread has turned into quite a mess. BTW, wait till you see the catfish Sewfish caught at Yuba today. If she doesn’t make a post by this evening I’ll do it myself.

I understand the Yuba regs, but like BL for instance, Is the story i got true from those co’s? I would really like to know the answer to that.[;)]

:sunglasses:I am waiting for a reply from a DWR person on that very subject. The early opinion from this guy was "[#000000]There was no way to prove he wasnt’ fishing for whitefish if he was already limited out on trout". Hopefully that can be expanded upon.[/#0000ff]


**Regardless of how clearly the regulations are spelled out, they will always be subject to interpretation…both by anglers and DWR officers. And, as we have discussed before, a CO retains the right to use personal discretion in how they treat each perceived infraction. Some of them are more mellow than others. They are also influenced by the attitudes of the offenders. If you get in their face and become belligerent, you deserve the ticket. If you are polite and respectful, you will often get some leniency. **