Posts: 1,794 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Jan 2009
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		So, I have been looking at 3wt rods (still [  ]). I will be 
using it in small streams wich may have trees and stuff 
around them so roll casting maybe the way to go. 
Would  DT 3wt F line be a better choice then WF 3wt F ?
  
Peter 
[signature]
	  
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 7,663 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Oct 2006
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Peter, 
  
here is a link to an interesting article that I just read on this very subject..  
  
[url "http://www.flyanglersonline.com/begin/101/dtvswf.php"]DT vs WF[/url] 
  
but the article basically says there is little to no difference in the performance of either line at the distances normally used by a fly fisher...  
  
MacFly [cool] 
[signature]
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 9,397 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Aug 2003
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		[font "Comic Sans MS"][#008000][size 3]I use a DT 3wt on my 2wt & 3wt rods. Perfectly satisfied with the performance. Think that roll casting with a DT will perform better. Might want to consider a 7-7½' rod. Want to catch fish and not branches. lol[/size][/#008000][/font] 
  
[signature]
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,794 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Jan 2009
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Great article !!! Thank you for posting that. I think that I will 
stay with the FW because sometimes (lake fishing) I do 
need to make longer casts and it looks like that for 
small creek fishing and short roll casts it makes no 
difference. 
One again, thank you 
  
Peter 
[signature]
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,794 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Jan 2009
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Yeah, no longer then 7 1/2 . Looks like SAR maybe 
coming up may way soon. I dont know how soon but 
soon.[  ]
  
Peter 
[signature]
	  
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 19,235 
	Threads: 1 
	Joined: Nov 2005
	
 Reputation: 
 1
	 
 
	
	
		Peter, sounds like you have decided to multi task the future 3 weight, but if not DT is a better choice for streams and creeks as it will load up at shorter distances.   
DT and WF are the same after that first 30', but most creeks I fish I am luck to see 20'.
 
That is why DT is easier to roll cast.  Plus you getting 2 lines for the price of one.[  ]
 
Specially on smaller gear. 
[signature]
	  
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 7,663 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Oct 2006
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		I knew Id heard that somewhere...LOL... 
  
MacFly [cool] 
[signature]
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,794 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Jan 2009
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Maybe I try to get some good deal on both and use the 
DT for Streams and the FW for lakes. 
You know what they say-one can NEVER have too many 
rods or lines........................[  ]
  
Peter 
[signature]
	  
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 9,397 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Aug 2003
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		[center] [font "Arial"][#008000][size 3] Well you can always get another spool.[/size][/#008000][/font]
[/center] 
[signature]
	  
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 19,235 
	Threads: 1 
	Joined: Nov 2005
	
 Reputation: 
 1
	 
 
	
	
		I don't know, that is allot for a 3 weight.   I admit I have both, but it is because I bought the DT a few years ago and then bought the WF. 
 
You could go Triangle Taper for both...LOL 
 
My 3 weight is DT, but my 2 weight is WF (superfine - also a very good choice for lighter rods) 
I have a DT for my 4 and WF for all else. 
[signature]
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 9,397 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Aug 2003
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		[center] [font "Comic Sans MS"][#008000][size 3] I'm getting the DTs reading all this stuff.  
Why does life have to be so complicated?[/size][/#008000][/font]  
[font "Comic Sans MS"][#008000][size 3]Likewise I bought my DT line a few years ago so 
I'm staying with it be it in creeks or weirs.[/size][/#008000][/font]
[font "Comic Sans MS"][#008000][size 3]BTW have you noticed the line-up of lines that are available in today's market. Since I was in marketing, a lot of products were made in different sizes, flavors/scents etc,etc for the main purpose of trying to dominate shelf space. [/size][/#008000][/font][font "Comic Sans MS"][#008000][size 3]The super market head merchandisers responded by selling shelf space to those that were willing to pay. No pay? No distribution.[/size][/#008000][/font]
[/center] 
[signature]
	  
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,794 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Jan 2009
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Yeah, I know. I would like to stay with only one 3wt line. 
But like DR say, why is life so complicated ?[  ] 
I think Im going to start with the WF and see what 
happens. 
But anyways, its still going to be some time before 
I can get that set up. First I have to sell some unwanted 
stuff on Ebay and use that money to get that 3wt set up.[  ]
  
Peter 
[signature]
	  
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 7,663 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Oct 2006
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		oh you got us all riled up over something you cant do yet... man.. you are really starting to sound like ME ..[laugh] 
  
actually I have several different lines for my 5/6 or 6 wt rods.. one really good reel.. and all the lines are on seperate spools that fit that reel.. I think FG clued me in on that idea a while back.. :-) 
  
MacFly [cool] 
[signature]
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 9,397 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Aug 2003
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		[font "Comic Sans MS"][#008000][size 3]And to think that it use to be so simple - get yourself a cane pole, some kite string, an old rusty hook and some dough balls and away we would go to the old fishing hole. 
[/size][/#008000][/font] 
[center][inline gorham-fishing.jpg] 
[/center] 
[signature]
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 19,235 
	Threads: 1 
	Joined: Nov 2005
	
 Reputation: 
 1
	 
 
	
	
		Peter, my suggestion on a line is the SELECTIVE TROUT II by Rio.  Nice thin soft line.  Nothing wrong with preferring WF in fact I am with you on that. 
There are four lines that I prefer (floating that is) 
1. Sharkskin (the GPX because it is 1/2 pound heavier at the head)   2.  Windcutter II    3.  Ridge Line   4.  Selective Trout II.
 
I also have a Rio Glow in the Dark, Gold,  Accelerator, Sylk, Superfine, Wonderline.   So, I have experimented.
 
Heay Ted....here you go:
 http://www.tenkarausa.com/index.php
I know, John you saw that comin' didn't you. 
[signature]
	  
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 9,397 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Aug 2003
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		[font "Comic Sans MS"][#008000][size 3] There you go Joni- just replace the dough ball with a fly. Really when one is fishing a creek like I did the other day that is all one needs to get the job done.[/size][/#008000][/font]
[signature]
	  
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,794 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Jan 2009
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Ohhhhhhhh, Selective trout II . Thats what I was looking for . Someone to tell me what to get. 
Thank you my lady as always[  ]
 
Peter 
[signature]
	  
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 7,663 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Oct 2006
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		yep I saw it coming.. but I look at it this way ... if you had not done it I would of.. LOL.. and the other thing is now a days you can always pump up the float tube.. sit in it with a cold beer.. and your tenkara rig and kick slowly around that old fishing old.. LOL..  
  
MacFly [cool] 
[signature]
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 7,663 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Oct 2006
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		now how do you think I came up with the rio grand for the mojo rod.. it was not on my own ..thats for sure.. LOL..  
  
MacFly [cool] 
[signature]
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,794 
	Threads: 0 
	Joined: Jan 2009
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Selective trout II 
Which one ?
  
 
[url "http://img1.iwascoding.de/2/2009/10/05/19F84733D5D84EE489EFEB897A2CA60A.jpg"] ![[Image: 19F84733D5D84EE489EFEB897A2CA60A.jpg]](http://img1.iwascoding.de/2/2009/10/05/19F84733D5D84EE489EFEB897A2CA60A.jpg) [/url] 
[signature]
	  
	
	
	
	
 
 
	 
 |