04-13-2015, 04:08 AM
Yes, this ruling only applies to this small section of the Weber River.
Now there will have to be a separate lawsuit brought for access to more of the area that had logs driven through it.
Hopefully the court, rather than have separate trials for each part of the river that is posted will state that the ruling applies to all parts of the river. It would save the state a lot of time and money.
Then on to any other river that had ever supported a log drive to have them declared as public. The Provo, Ogden, Logan, Bear, Sevier, Duchesne, Strawberry, pretty much any river or stream that had logs or even cordwood floated down it in order to get the wood from harvest point to market.
[signature]
Now there will have to be a separate lawsuit brought for access to more of the area that had logs driven through it.
Hopefully the court, rather than have separate trials for each part of the river that is posted will state that the ruling applies to all parts of the river. It would save the state a lot of time and money.
Then on to any other river that had ever supported a log drive to have them declared as public. The Provo, Ogden, Logan, Bear, Sevier, Duchesne, Strawberry, pretty much any river or stream that had logs or even cordwood floated down it in order to get the wood from harvest point to market.
[signature]