01-22-2014, 12:14 AM
The only other explanation I have is that since the Feds don't want all this extra traffic across the road on the bridge due to security concerns they inflated plans 20 fold. They're putting a little money from each sale toward the $3 million cost of an downstream bridge. If they put some realistic numbers together it'll take 30-50 years to fund that bridge and the Feds won't give the go ahead on '"temporary" use of the road across the dam. You can beat no matter how far below their pie in the sky numbers they fall that once things are built access across the dam will never be taken away even when it becomes clear they'll never have enough money to begin to fund a downstream bridge.
I say we don't see that downstream bridge at all within 20 years unless taxpayers get stuck funding it.
[signature]
I say we don't see that downstream bridge at all within 20 years unless taxpayers get stuck funding it.
[signature]