Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Flasher vs Fishfinder
#13
Marcum LX-9. Last season, it showed me all of the display styles - flasher, graph, vertical water collumn with zoom and more selectively displayed as a heads up display over high resolution video from the camera.

The blobs of color would have meant as little to me as abstract art, but with the camera, I can lower it to see the structure that would be otherwise left to the imagination from seeing blobs of color. I had no idea of the bottom from that until I lowered the camera to see a submerged tree with fish swimming in and out of it. After seeing a few camera views of different structure, right away I have a good idea of what the other displays are indicating.

Other than the displays, the signal processing is advanced and showing me the fish interaction with the lure as I see the video of the same with the camera. It seems to be quite an advantage.

I still have to learn to use it better because it seems from viewing the fish that they can feel the sonar and I should turn down the power. I haven't been ice fishing enough to figure out that part yet.

One thing new to me that I just bought to try this season is a meter with a digital display of dissolved oxygen and temperature. I haven't even opened the package with a booklet on how to use it, so I'm not able to report on possible advantages yet.
[signature]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Flasher vs Fishfinder - by americanforkdude - 11-15-2013, 10:47 PM
Re: [RockyRaab] Flasher vs Fishfinder - by 6x6 - 11-16-2013, 06:04 PM
Re: [americanforkdude] Flasher vs Fishfinder - by RonPaulFan - 11-17-2013, 06:37 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)