06-14-2013, 01:30 PM
Bardic wrote:[/quote]
Yep, that makes sense to me. He should have known he was opening that waterway to the public by making himself an access out to the river (and gaining access to a lot more water than he has water rights to). I wish he was more reasonable like the Shelley pond, they don't want us on their property, but understand that the pond itself is now public.
I do hope this gets settled in a higher court, and makes me wonder about the judge who ruled in Beck's favor...[/quote]
I say we vote the judge out. On the ballots there is a place that asks if a judge should be retained in office. You get a chance to vote them out. Lets publicize his name and vote the man out of a job.
[signature]
Yep, that makes sense to me. He should have known he was opening that waterway to the public by making himself an access out to the river (and gaining access to a lot more water than he has water rights to). I wish he was more reasonable like the Shelley pond, they don't want us on their property, but understand that the pond itself is now public.
I do hope this gets settled in a higher court, and makes me wonder about the judge who ruled in Beck's favor...[/quote]
I say we vote the judge out. On the ballots there is a place that asks if a judge should be retained in office. You get a chance to vote them out. Lets publicize his name and vote the man out of a job.
[signature]