06-05-2013, 04:10 AM
Nice letter. I assumed after all that was done the last time this issue was taken up that we had settled law on the right of way for boaters and the fact that is was indeed navigable water. I believe the irrigation district backed the land owner and lost. The case was pushed forward by the IDFG and was settled by the AG. The fact that most of the land owners have boat docks and boats that frequently use the entrance of the water flow as a boating access to the river would certainly prove this water to be navigable. The water is also wholly owned by as a unit by the possessors of the water rights and state granted rights for the river. If this water is non-navigable should it even enter Beck's property?
[signature]
[signature]