04-18-2013, 02:15 PM
[quote Goldster]
A DNR field officer inspected my boat and issued me a citation for...
G[/quote]
[quote UTmuddguy]one more interesting tidbit is that under allocation rules 85% of boating fine money is allocated to state parks so state park rangers have some incentive to write tickets ...[/quote]
[quote CoyoteSpinner]never been to Mantua I take it?
Used to suggest they needed the funds for the Policeman's ball's, but was informed they have none, so . . . [/quote]
Make up your minds guys. Goldster claimed the LEO was "DNR". Not State Parks and not "Police". DNR. If this is correct, then the DNR CO would have had NO incentive to falsely write citations in anticipation of some added benefit to him personally.
I don't buy it fellas. I just don't believe for 1 second that the citation was written out of spite, or for some kind of personal gain by the LEO. Lack of understanding of the rules? Probably. Mistake? Sure. False accusation for personal gain? No way.
[signature]
A DNR field officer inspected my boat and issued me a citation for...
G[/quote]
[quote UTmuddguy]one more interesting tidbit is that under allocation rules 85% of boating fine money is allocated to state parks so state park rangers have some incentive to write tickets ...[/quote]
[quote CoyoteSpinner]never been to Mantua I take it?
Used to suggest they needed the funds for the Policeman's ball's, but was informed they have none, so . . . [/quote]
Make up your minds guys. Goldster claimed the LEO was "DNR". Not State Parks and not "Police". DNR. If this is correct, then the DNR CO would have had NO incentive to falsely write citations in anticipation of some added benefit to him personally.
I don't buy it fellas. I just don't believe for 1 second that the citation was written out of spite, or for some kind of personal gain by the LEO. Lack of understanding of the rules? Probably. Mistake? Sure. False accusation for personal gain? No way.
[signature]