02-14-2013, 08:43 PM
[font "Times New Roman"][size 3][/size][/font]
[size 3]Snergy,Couple of things:
1) I think you meant to say Utah Stream Access Coalition, inlieu of UtahRivers... Thier web site is [/size][url "http://www.utahstreamaccess.org/"][#212126][size 3]www.utahstreamaccess.org[/size][/#212126][/url][size 3]
2) The proposed bill is templated from Idaho. The foundation for 6"diameter x 6-ft long log comes from historic rail road tie cuts. It is historic and easily definable.
2a) You missed a key element regarding log float - Referring to the stream -"in its natural state during ordinary high water".
3) It will not interfere with the lawsuits. It will make them a totally moot point.
Frankly, there is much too much conjecture an assumptions being tossed about. Please refrain from posting hyperbole. The issue is confusing enough without all the misinformation. Take a moment to check before posting.[/size]
[font "Times New Roman"][size 3][/size][/font]
[signature]
[size 3]Snergy,Couple of things:
1) I think you meant to say Utah Stream Access Coalition, inlieu of UtahRivers... Thier web site is [/size][url "http://www.utahstreamaccess.org/"][#212126][size 3]www.utahstreamaccess.org[/size][/#212126][/url][size 3]
2) The proposed bill is templated from Idaho. The foundation for 6"diameter x 6-ft long log comes from historic rail road tie cuts. It is historic and easily definable.
2a) You missed a key element regarding log float - Referring to the stream -"in its natural state during ordinary high water".
3) It will not interfere with the lawsuits. It will make them a totally moot point.
Frankly, there is much too much conjecture an assumptions being tossed about. Please refrain from posting hyperbole. The issue is confusing enough without all the misinformation. Take a moment to check before posting.[/size]
[font "Times New Roman"][size 3][/size][/font]
[signature]