02-08-2011, 04:08 PM
I see nothing wrong with keeping a limit "IF" you eat them. If you are keeping them for bragging rights to only end up putting them in your freezer to later put in the Garden or worse yet Garbage...then I think one is very selfish and ignorant.
As far as the trophy waters like Henry's and others, I think any trout over 24" is not the best eating. So with that, the lakes that have the two fish limit for fish OVER 20" is a little confusing to me. Okay, I see the big one being mounted but the second one? Like I said, they don't taste that great. You could smoke I guess. I had some smoked trout this weekend. A nice MUSHY 24" trout.
Anyway, a limit is a limit....the problem I see is people need to ask them self if they need that whole limit, or are they taking it because it is there right, or if they don't some one else will. People can be greedy by nature.
[signature]
As far as the trophy waters like Henry's and others, I think any trout over 24" is not the best eating. So with that, the lakes that have the two fish limit for fish OVER 20" is a little confusing to me. Okay, I see the big one being mounted but the second one? Like I said, they don't taste that great. You could smoke I guess. I had some smoked trout this weekend. A nice MUSHY 24" trout.
Anyway, a limit is a limit....the problem I see is people need to ask them self if they need that whole limit, or are they taking it because it is there right, or if they don't some one else will. People can be greedy by nature.
[signature]