07-10-2010, 11:32 AM
I have read a few pages of it and saw a few items that were a little concerning .
Lack of fisherman input ; I have to guess that is because the D.N.R (DNRE) has done as it damn well pleases in the past without regard of the Michigan sportsman .
No recent data collected ; Really , change the regulations without knowing how that ecosystem is ?
Unknown length of the river ; What ? Are they kidding me ?
This is a fine example of how the DNR/DNRE name change hasn't changed a thing , the same old system with the same results .
You know the old adage "If it aimed broke , don't fix it " is something the DNRE should try on for size .
[signature]
Lack of fisherman input ; I have to guess that is because the D.N.R (DNRE) has done as it damn well pleases in the past without regard of the Michigan sportsman .
No recent data collected ; Really , change the regulations without knowing how that ecosystem is ?
Unknown length of the river ; What ? Are they kidding me ?
This is a fine example of how the DNR/DNRE name change hasn't changed a thing , the same old system with the same results .
You know the old adage "If it aimed broke , don't fix it " is something the DNRE should try on for size .
[signature]