Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Winder
#7
They have a "new system"? The canal company is actually smartening up and not wiping out the fisheries?

I have always thought that the canal co really approached things wrong by threatening and destroying the fisheries and going "private" on lakes.

They have done nothing in my book but prove to me that they won't manage any "new" water with the public's interest in mind at all. Why should we replace a good public fishery with a private one managed by them and funded by us?

Sorry - off my soap box now. [blush]
[signature]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Winder - by cpierce - 05-16-2010, 05:53 PM
Re: [cpierce] Winder - by cpierce - 05-18-2010, 12:05 AM
Re: [cpierce] Winder - by prvrt - 05-18-2010, 02:56 AM
Re: [prvrt] Winder - by cpierce - 05-18-2010, 03:10 AM
Re: [cpierce] Winder - by duksnfish - 05-18-2010, 01:06 PM
Re: [duksnfish] Winder - by gstott - 05-18-2010, 05:10 PM
Re: [gstott] Winder - by cpierce - 05-18-2010, 07:29 PM
Re: [cpierce] Winder - by duksnfish - 05-18-2010, 08:05 PM
Re: [duksnfish] Winder - by cpierce - 05-18-2010, 11:20 PM
Re: [cpierce] Winder - by curt69 - 05-18-2010, 11:46 PM
Re: [curt69] Winder - by duksnfish - 05-19-2010, 04:15 PM
Re: [duksnfish] Winder - by cpierce - 05-19-2010, 04:42 PM
Re: [cpierce] Winder - by dma_ayotte - 05-19-2010, 09:35 PM
Re: [dma_ayotte] Winder - by MADDOGG - 05-20-2010, 08:47 PM
Re: [MADDOGG] Winder - by packfish - 05-20-2010, 09:05 PM
Re: [packfish] Winder - by MADDOGG - 05-20-2010, 10:23 PM
Re: [MADDOGG] Winder - by MADDOGG - 05-20-2010, 10:43 PM
Re: [MADDOGG] Winder - by dma_ayotte - 05-20-2010, 10:58 PM
Re: [MADDOGG] Winder - by duksnfish - 05-21-2010, 12:18 PM
Re: [duksnfish] Winder - by MADDOGG - 05-21-2010, 08:52 PM
Re: [MADDOGG] Winder - by duksnfish - 05-21-2010, 10:25 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)