04-04-2010, 07:20 PM
"I'm not sure I know what you mean when you say the point system is screwed up in WY. I haven't seen anything wrong with it but maybe I'm not seeing the big picture."
Pack:
Its all personal opinion. What I don't like is that 75% of the tags go to those who are in the max point pool. That does not leave many tags for the people in the non max pool. I am saying this and I have max points for deer and elk. Utah allows 50% to go for the max point pool. Which is a
little better.
Having said this, there will never be a perfect system. The most perfect system IMO is Nevada. They square your points every year and add 1. In other words, If you apply 3 years you would have 10 chances (3X3)+1.
Thats as close to a "perfect" system as there is. It rewards those who have applied for a long time and has no "max pool", just more chances.
My second system would be no points and everyone has the same chance. But that is just my opinions (which isn't worth much).
[signature]
Pack:
Its all personal opinion. What I don't like is that 75% of the tags go to those who are in the max point pool. That does not leave many tags for the people in the non max pool. I am saying this and I have max points for deer and elk. Utah allows 50% to go for the max point pool. Which is a
little better.
Having said this, there will never be a perfect system. The most perfect system IMO is Nevada. They square your points every year and add 1. In other words, If you apply 3 years you would have 10 chances (3X3)+1.
Thats as close to a "perfect" system as there is. It rewards those who have applied for a long time and has no "max pool", just more chances.
My second system would be no points and everyone has the same chance. But that is just my opinions (which isn't worth much).
[signature]