04-03-2010, 12:08 AM
X2FSH,
Fish and Game only has a say to a point and it is nothing close to that of which the original poster is suggesting they do. They can recommend some increases or decreases in flows but ultimately it comes down to fulfilling water rights to cities, endangered species, farmers and other states, whether the OP likes it or not.
[signature]
Fish and Game only has a say to a point and it is nothing close to that of which the original poster is suggesting they do. They can recommend some increases or decreases in flows but ultimately it comes down to fulfilling water rights to cities, endangered species, farmers and other states, whether the OP likes it or not.
[signature]