03-11-2010, 03:57 AM
If anything you got it backwards Private Landowners not willing to work with Anglers.
HB80 was a good compromise would have benefited all. HB141 was evil in so many ways that only private land money could have influenced the senates decision.
It infringes on our constitutional rights HB141 Ignores the 1937 Adams v. Portage Irrigation case that says that the public's right to use the public water is a right guaranteed by the Utah Constitution
It adds to the down turn of our economy fact that farmers take more public taxes in the form of subsidies. Ignores the fact that the public pays to maintain and stock the public water, including infrastructure, erosion control, and flood mitigation, etc.
If this is what private landowners want then they better believe theres going to be a fight never once in history have Americans allowed foreign or domestic entities infringe upon there constitutional rights
[signature]
HB80 was a good compromise would have benefited all. HB141 was evil in so many ways that only private land money could have influenced the senates decision.
It infringes on our constitutional rights HB141 Ignores the 1937 Adams v. Portage Irrigation case that says that the public's right to use the public water is a right guaranteed by the Utah Constitution
It adds to the down turn of our economy fact that farmers take more public taxes in the form of subsidies. Ignores the fact that the public pays to maintain and stock the public water, including infrastructure, erosion control, and flood mitigation, etc.
If this is what private landowners want then they better believe theres going to be a fight never once in history have Americans allowed foreign or domestic entities infringe upon there constitutional rights
[signature]