02-05-2010, 10:44 PM
I don't see this going over very well in a less government is better state like idaho. It might be worth it if it got the fish and game to actually do their job. Just my personal experience but I haven't been to impressed with the idaho fish and game. Last year I reported a violation that I'm pretty sure nothing was done about. I gave them first and last names, dates, locations, and the multiple incidence. Seems like that would be enough info to at least check on it. I know they didn't because the guys who did it are some of my neighbors. I also had a friend who reported a big game violation that I thought was pretty serious (someone shot a buck and took the head and left the whole deer) they told him there was nothing they could do about it. I don't know how serious a crime that is but if it's not it should be.
I don't think the money would make any difference. It's bureaucracy and they would just take the money and make it a bigger bureaucracy.
[signature]
I don't think the money would make any difference. It's bureaucracy and they would just take the money and make it a bigger bureaucracy.
[signature]