05-24-2009, 06:53 AM
Well thats what the guy asked for $20,000.
I didn't know that those dogs were that expensive.
To use tax payer money to compensate for hunting dogs is pure theft! Plain and simple.
For livestock when wolves and other predators get the cattle I can see a compensation. Not for hunters,sorry.
Thats your own darn fault for paying out that much money just to kill a bear.
That sounds like some crazy obsession to spend that amount to kill a bear.
Why not just dump honey someplace and wait for the bear to come eat it.[cool]
I think hunters should hunt things to eat.
There are 1,500,000 white-tailed deer in Wisconsin and about 500 wolves. How can 500 wolves devour 1.5 million deer beats the heck out of me.
But 500 wolves can kill livestock. So I think they will come to a "solution". And thats put the wolf on the endangered species list. [:p]
I happen to love wolves. I wish people would just leave the wilderness alone. But that doesn't mean I don't feel for the ranchers.
[signature]
I didn't know that those dogs were that expensive.
To use tax payer money to compensate for hunting dogs is pure theft! Plain and simple.
For livestock when wolves and other predators get the cattle I can see a compensation. Not for hunters,sorry.
Thats your own darn fault for paying out that much money just to kill a bear.
That sounds like some crazy obsession to spend that amount to kill a bear.
Why not just dump honey someplace and wait for the bear to come eat it.[cool]
I think hunters should hunt things to eat.
There are 1,500,000 white-tailed deer in Wisconsin and about 500 wolves. How can 500 wolves devour 1.5 million deer beats the heck out of me.
But 500 wolves can kill livestock. So I think they will come to a "solution". And thats put the wolf on the endangered species list. [:p]
I happen to love wolves. I wish people would just leave the wilderness alone. But that doesn't mean I don't feel for the ranchers.
[signature]