02-06-2009, 05:52 AM
Regardless of the state being guilty or not, this law is ridiculous. That's like saying "you have a probable chance of dying if you camp here but if I don't warn you about it I'm not responsible".
This is my view on the subject from what I gather: Fathers day weekend, a chance for the state to gain some revenue from camping. Why put a stop to the cash flow just because some silly bear was spotted in the campgrounds? One person, I think, made the decision not to announce the warning, a young boy was killed and his parents devastated yet it is the state being sued. Who made the call not to issue a warning? Why is he/she not named in this? "Just doing what the boss tells me to do" [mad]
[signature]
This is my view on the subject from what I gather: Fathers day weekend, a chance for the state to gain some revenue from camping. Why put a stop to the cash flow just because some silly bear was spotted in the campgrounds? One person, I think, made the decision not to announce the warning, a young boy was killed and his parents devastated yet it is the state being sued. Who made the call not to issue a warning? Why is he/she not named in this? "Just doing what the boss tells me to do" [mad]
[signature]