05-14-2003, 12:59 AM
O.K. I DON'T AGREE WITH LITTERING EITHER , I SPEND COUNTLESS HOURS EVERY YEAR PICKING UP TRASH , BUT , I DON'T AGREE WITH THE C.O. PUTTING PEOPLE UNDER SURVELANCE WAITING FOR THEM TO MAKE A MISTAKE EITHER . BEFORE I START , I AM NOT A LAWYER , JUST A BLUE COLLAR FACTORY WORKER WITH A HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION.
IN COURT YOU NEED TO KNOW FROM THE OFFICER WHAT ACTIONS THAT YOU WERE DOING THAT CAUSED HIN TO PUT YOU UNDER SURVELANCE . SMOKING IS NOT A JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE , IT IS NOT ILLEAGLE TO SMOKE . ANY OTHER REASON THAT HE GIVES , WELL , DIDN'T PAN OUT SO HE USED THE CIGARETTE AS AN EXCUSE FOR SPYING ON YOU . WHY WAS HE "LUREING " AT YOUR WIFE AND NOT WATCHING YOU ? YOU WERE THE OPERATOR OF THE BOAT . THE WIFE WAS THE PASSENGER . SHULDN'T HE HAVE BEEN CONCERTRATING ON YOU INSTEAD ?
HOW DO YOU KNOW FOR SURE THIS GUY JUST ISN'T A PERV TRYING TO GET HER PERSONAL INFORMATION ? DOES HE OR HAS HE HAD ANY COMPLAINTS FILED AGAINST HIM IN ANY FORM , ODDS ARE YES .
THE DISTANCE BETWEEN YOU AND HE AND THE LENGTH OF TIME DURING SURVELANCE NEEDS TO BE TAKEN INTO CONCIDERATION AND THE BINOCULARS WEIGHT . ON A TRIPOD PROVES UNWARENTED SURVELANCE AND INNEFECTIVE ON A MOVING OBJECT , HANDHELD IMPOSSIBLE TO KEEP A STEADY FOCAL POINT ON A STATIONARY OBJECT LET ALONE A BOAT BOUNCING ON THE WAVES . TO FOCUS ON A CIGARETTE BUT AT ??? YARDS ON A VEHICAL IN MOTION ? PRIOR TO YOUR APPEARANCE DATE GET PERMISSION FROM THE COURT TO BRING IN A VIDEO CAMERA ( SMALL ONE ABOUT 3-5 LBS. IN WEIGHT , HAVE SOMEONE IN COURT FLICK A CIGARETTE BUTT FROM ACROSS THE ROOM AND SEE IF HE CAN FOLLOW IT . NO WAY , NO CASE .
EVEN THOU YOUR WIFE MAY BE GUILTY , JUDGES FROWN ON OFFICERS WHO PURPOSELY WATCH PEOPLE WITHOUT A WARRENT OR "PROBBLE CAUSE " WAITING FOR ANY EXCUSE TO TICKET THEM , SMOKING IS NOT PROBBLE CAUSE .
IF YOU DO WIN PUT A PEACE BOND OUT ON THE OFFICER , THIS GOES ON HIS RECORD AND KEEPS YOU CLEAR OF ANY REPRISALS FROM HIM .
THERE ARE PLENTY OF FREE LEAGLE ADVICE WEB PAGES TO GUIDE YOU IN GETTING FREE LEGAL ADVICE OR EVEN A LAWYER . WITH A LAWYER YOU HAVE A BETTER CHANCE AT WINNING , WHEN YOU WIN YOU FILE SUIT FOR YOUR COSTS , INCLUDING THE LAWYERS FEES . I'M NO LAWYER BUT I DO KNOW MY RIGHTS . BEING SPIED ON (EVEN IN PUBLIC PLACES )IS ILLEAGEL WITHOUT A PROBBLE CAUSE .
I'M SURE YOUR WIFE HAS LEARNED A VALUABLE LESSON FROM ALL OF THIS , SO I WON'T BUST MY GUMS OVER IT . GOOD LUCK !
[signature]
IN COURT YOU NEED TO KNOW FROM THE OFFICER WHAT ACTIONS THAT YOU WERE DOING THAT CAUSED HIN TO PUT YOU UNDER SURVELANCE . SMOKING IS NOT A JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE , IT IS NOT ILLEAGLE TO SMOKE . ANY OTHER REASON THAT HE GIVES , WELL , DIDN'T PAN OUT SO HE USED THE CIGARETTE AS AN EXCUSE FOR SPYING ON YOU . WHY WAS HE "LUREING " AT YOUR WIFE AND NOT WATCHING YOU ? YOU WERE THE OPERATOR OF THE BOAT . THE WIFE WAS THE PASSENGER . SHULDN'T HE HAVE BEEN CONCERTRATING ON YOU INSTEAD ?
HOW DO YOU KNOW FOR SURE THIS GUY JUST ISN'T A PERV TRYING TO GET HER PERSONAL INFORMATION ? DOES HE OR HAS HE HAD ANY COMPLAINTS FILED AGAINST HIM IN ANY FORM , ODDS ARE YES .
THE DISTANCE BETWEEN YOU AND HE AND THE LENGTH OF TIME DURING SURVELANCE NEEDS TO BE TAKEN INTO CONCIDERATION AND THE BINOCULARS WEIGHT . ON A TRIPOD PROVES UNWARENTED SURVELANCE AND INNEFECTIVE ON A MOVING OBJECT , HANDHELD IMPOSSIBLE TO KEEP A STEADY FOCAL POINT ON A STATIONARY OBJECT LET ALONE A BOAT BOUNCING ON THE WAVES . TO FOCUS ON A CIGARETTE BUT AT ??? YARDS ON A VEHICAL IN MOTION ? PRIOR TO YOUR APPEARANCE DATE GET PERMISSION FROM THE COURT TO BRING IN A VIDEO CAMERA ( SMALL ONE ABOUT 3-5 LBS. IN WEIGHT , HAVE SOMEONE IN COURT FLICK A CIGARETTE BUTT FROM ACROSS THE ROOM AND SEE IF HE CAN FOLLOW IT . NO WAY , NO CASE .
EVEN THOU YOUR WIFE MAY BE GUILTY , JUDGES FROWN ON OFFICERS WHO PURPOSELY WATCH PEOPLE WITHOUT A WARRENT OR "PROBBLE CAUSE " WAITING FOR ANY EXCUSE TO TICKET THEM , SMOKING IS NOT PROBBLE CAUSE .
IF YOU DO WIN PUT A PEACE BOND OUT ON THE OFFICER , THIS GOES ON HIS RECORD AND KEEPS YOU CLEAR OF ANY REPRISALS FROM HIM .
THERE ARE PLENTY OF FREE LEAGLE ADVICE WEB PAGES TO GUIDE YOU IN GETTING FREE LEGAL ADVICE OR EVEN A LAWYER . WITH A LAWYER YOU HAVE A BETTER CHANCE AT WINNING , WHEN YOU WIN YOU FILE SUIT FOR YOUR COSTS , INCLUDING THE LAWYERS FEES . I'M NO LAWYER BUT I DO KNOW MY RIGHTS . BEING SPIED ON (EVEN IN PUBLIC PLACES )IS ILLEAGEL WITHOUT A PROBBLE CAUSE .
I'M SURE YOUR WIFE HAS LEARNED A VALUABLE LESSON FROM ALL OF THIS , SO I WON'T BUST MY GUMS OVER IT . GOOD LUCK !
[signature]