07-23-2008, 04:25 AM
The judgment does NOT say anything about the "high water mark" being any sort of boundary. It does discuss being in contact with the riverbed, in the water.
http://www.utcourts.gov/opinions/supopin...071808.pdf
The Montana law demarcates the high water mark as the boundary and this is possibly where some people are assuming that the Utah law is the same.
[signature]
http://www.utcourts.gov/opinions/supopin...071808.pdf
The Montana law demarcates the high water mark as the boundary and this is possibly where some people are assuming that the Utah law is the same.
[signature]