Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Old Web Site vs. New Web Site
#51
1. [frown]Script is to small
2.[crazy] Reply was hard to find
3.[unimpressed] NO AVITAR
4. [pirate]No little fish to let others know how long one has been with the site
5.[frown] Private Messages-where is it
6. [Wink]Would like to see maps of area lakes
7. [frown]less fonts to choose from

[#000000]When I first started with this web site it was hard to figure out, Now for new on lookers it is even harder. [/#000000]
[#000000]and the Forums I do not like, to small.[/#000000]

7. BFT is not an easy Web site to find unless some one let's you know it's out there compared to DWR, or Utah fish places, or others that is findable.

[#ff0000]8. [Wink] KISS keep it simple sir![/#ff0000]
[#ff0000][/#ff0000]
[#000000]Over all the information is the best ever, But navigating around in the site is hard even for someone that has been here awhile.[:/][/#000000]
[#ff0000][/#ff0000]
[#000000]Remember this is my opinon, some others might like it.[/#000000]
[signature]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Old Web Site vs. New Web Site - by Old_Coot - 04-15-2008, 12:38 AM
Re: [Old_Coot] Old Web Site vs. New Web Site - by FishNCoach - 04-15-2008, 10:20 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)