01-18-2008, 08:36 PM
[cool][font "Pristina"][green][size 4]Hey there FGD I am not questioning your knowledge of flies far be it from that. So let me go back to the beginning. Since I am fond of the Royal Wulff I decided to try my hand at tying one. I have several in my collection of various sizes that I purchased before I started to tie. They all have the split wing pattern. I came across a tying video site for the Royal Wulff that illustrated a laid back calf’s tail. [I used goat hair instead] This fly looked a bit easier to tie. Since they called their fly a Royal Wulff, consequently I used its name in my post. BTW I do know what a RW looks like however, I wasn’t familiar with the Royal Trude not having or used any in the past just that it was a variation of the RW. Now the question I have is do you think that site and a couple of others made a mistake in naming their fly? I will PM you the site as surfing will eventually lead one to a forum. Due to your attention to this subject I will correct the name in my original post.[/size][/green][/font]
[signature]
[signature]
