Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bladder construction: ODC420 vs SFC
#4
Hmm. Good question, Matt. Guess I spoke too quickly. I don't fish salt (the thought of fishing where there might be something big enough to take me and my tube in a head to tail rise is unsettling) and I seldom catch anything with sharp fins or teeth so your situation is very different than mine. Guess my trout fishing advice doesn't apply in this case.

Would I choose a used-one-time Fat Cat for $200 over the ODC if I fished where the tube might get punctured? Yes. It was the $375 price tag that I choked on once I saw that the quality, for the purpose I use it, was not really worth the extra $. I didn't need the more expensive bladders.

The only thing I might add is that after reading Tubedude's comments about his Super Fat Cat with the inflatable seat, I would only buy the foam seated Fat Cat.

Surely someone else can contribute something here. ATFishing owns several ODC's and fishes the salt in So. Cal. You there, AT?

z~
[signature]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Bladder construction: ODC420 vs SFC - by mkim - 12-03-2005, 02:20 AM
Re: [mkim] Bladder construction: ODC420 vs SFC - by zonker - 12-03-2005, 06:16 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)