Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
BFT's position on recent events
#44
[reply]
One thing you won't hear form me, though is a report on where, how many/big , what was used, sort of thing. You might say I'm the anti-report type, probably more accurately described as a NOT-spotter, rather than HOT spotter.
L.E.Tist [/reply]

I respect your choice to not post fishing reports or any useful information as to where, when, how you fished and any results of your top secret activity. I just don't understand how sharing some information about CERTAIN fishing locations is such a bad thing. I realize that SOME fishing locations can not handle the publicity and added fishing pressure and maybe you only fish those locations; but what is the harm in saying you fished at Strawberry on Wednesday NEAR the marina for 6 hours with the water temp 49 degree's and caught 34 slot cutts and 1 cutt that was 24 inches on white tube jigs in ABOUT 30 feet of water. All fish were returned to the water for another angler to catch on a different day.

Sure a few people might run right out and try their luck in the general area of the marina in about 30 feet of water and maybe they catch a few fish. So what, they have to return almost all if not all of there fish caught as well.

I just don't understand where the harm in sharing general fishing reports and information is?
[signature]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
BFT's position on recent events - by theangler - 11-05-2005, 06:50 AM
Re: [L.E.Tist] BFT's position on recent events - by Bigcat - 11-10-2005, 08:37 PM
Re: BFT's position on recent events - by Teroy - 11-24-2005, 01:28 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)