05-14-2005, 12:55 PM
as per this artical states, if the organizion was on the up and up it would be to thier advantage to sit down to a table to devise a program we can both work on. there truley is a lot of work to be done and vary little time to do it in.
unfortunatly since the corproation (PETA) is not on the level, it is not to thier advantage to sit down to any table. they scam thier donors in to beleiving they are doing something to bring aid to animals yet they are major stock holders of other corporations that cut down rain forest, hard woods, grass praires all for the sake of producing drugs, timber for housing and soy beans for plastic and fake food.
they treat animals like pest, and destroy every one they come in contact with. to hide thier guilt they hide behind the false notion of making unsuspecting individuals beleiving that if you donate to them you are doing something to help the animals. when if they realy wanted to help the animals they would put together programs to teach todays children about what human over population dose to not only the animals invironment but our own as well. This needs to be done world wide before a real desease outbreaks and wipes out 4/5ths of the human population leaving homes to such animals as cocheroaches ants maggots and spiders.
since we no longer have barriors to protect us from the spread of plagues because of hourly flights arond the world transporting desease contaminated products and goods by one human to another....
back in the 40s 50s and 60s we had every thing stoped at the ports for quarenteen today it is on the dirt floors of factories in africa india america ect to your house in almost a day. many bacteria live long past a day..... all this for the bottom line....
Peta lives on the concence of misguided people, and should they tell the truth they would go out of bussness.... so bringing them to the table is not profitable for them and is pointless in my belief a waist of our time, they are part of the problem.
I could be wrong, but from where I stand any one will have a hard time convincing me different. I will keep my mind open, but it will take them showing me thier balance sheets for the last 20 years before I will even concider changing my mind about any thing they do.
**** I am not picking on any individual member. I honestly beleive that for the most part their hearts are in the right place, they just have been misinformed by a feel good corporation that has been corupted by money....
this is how I beleive the peta scam works. [ul] [li]peta is owned by lawers.[/li] [li]peta hires full time lawers for staff. (them selves)[/li] [li]they have to spend 5% of their gross income on thier cause.[/li][/ul]
so at 13 million a year they only have to have only one 650 thousand dollar frivalis law suit against a circus about a dancing polar bear to meet all government qualifications for being a charitable organization.
and what happens, [ol] [li]members are scammed in to beleiving they did something good.[/li] [li]they turn members against outdoorsmen who are poviding a service for these members whether the members beleive it or not.[/li] [li]to keep in the public eye peta has to make all kinds of outlandish comments and demands on hunting and fishing. [/li][/ol]
the truth is, 13 million dollars buys a lot of land that could be turned in to wild life santuary, but they would have to have preditors and if they are in an are where they cant plant wolves bears wild cats they would have to rely upon hunters and anglers to help reduce that what would be come over populated other wise.....
Sorry PETA, the truth hurts.....
[signature]
unfortunatly since the corproation (PETA) is not on the level, it is not to thier advantage to sit down to any table. they scam thier donors in to beleiving they are doing something to bring aid to animals yet they are major stock holders of other corporations that cut down rain forest, hard woods, grass praires all for the sake of producing drugs, timber for housing and soy beans for plastic and fake food.
they treat animals like pest, and destroy every one they come in contact with. to hide thier guilt they hide behind the false notion of making unsuspecting individuals beleiving that if you donate to them you are doing something to help the animals. when if they realy wanted to help the animals they would put together programs to teach todays children about what human over population dose to not only the animals invironment but our own as well. This needs to be done world wide before a real desease outbreaks and wipes out 4/5ths of the human population leaving homes to such animals as cocheroaches ants maggots and spiders.
since we no longer have barriors to protect us from the spread of plagues because of hourly flights arond the world transporting desease contaminated products and goods by one human to another....
back in the 40s 50s and 60s we had every thing stoped at the ports for quarenteen today it is on the dirt floors of factories in africa india america ect to your house in almost a day. many bacteria live long past a day..... all this for the bottom line....
Peta lives on the concence of misguided people, and should they tell the truth they would go out of bussness.... so bringing them to the table is not profitable for them and is pointless in my belief a waist of our time, they are part of the problem.
I could be wrong, but from where I stand any one will have a hard time convincing me different. I will keep my mind open, but it will take them showing me thier balance sheets for the last 20 years before I will even concider changing my mind about any thing they do.
**** I am not picking on any individual member. I honestly beleive that for the most part their hearts are in the right place, they just have been misinformed by a feel good corporation that has been corupted by money....
this is how I beleive the peta scam works. [ul] [li]peta is owned by lawers.[/li] [li]peta hires full time lawers for staff. (them selves)[/li] [li]they have to spend 5% of their gross income on thier cause.[/li][/ul]
so at 13 million a year they only have to have only one 650 thousand dollar frivalis law suit against a circus about a dancing polar bear to meet all government qualifications for being a charitable organization.
and what happens, [ol] [li]members are scammed in to beleiving they did something good.[/li] [li]they turn members against outdoorsmen who are poviding a service for these members whether the members beleive it or not.[/li] [li]to keep in the public eye peta has to make all kinds of outlandish comments and demands on hunting and fishing. [/li][/ol]
the truth is, 13 million dollars buys a lot of land that could be turned in to wild life santuary, but they would have to have preditors and if they are in an are where they cant plant wolves bears wild cats they would have to rely upon hunters and anglers to help reduce that what would be come over populated other wise.....
Sorry PETA, the truth hurts.....
[signature]