10-03-2004, 03:08 PM
[font "Comic Sans MS"][black][size 3]There is no comparison to the retraction of Fox and "Memo gate" scandal that CBS tried to shove down the American peoples throat as the truth even though CBS's own people told Rather the documents were not authenticated. Even after several people close to the story and THEIR own staff told CBS news that the papers were forged, Rather still stuck to his guns, ran the story as a headliner for several days, only to ruined his and CBS's reputation. Go look at the ratings of who is watching what and how far CBS has slipped because of "Memo gate" and unbias. slanted news reporting.
The FOX misquotes were a totally different situation. Fox bellied up to the bar and IMMEDIATELY (the same day), on their own behalf, pull the story, admitting it was bad information. If only Dan Rather and CBS would of been so fair about it instead of trying to shove forged documents down our throats as the truth they might have kept their reputation of reporting the news as credible.
The real question is who fed those documents to CBS? All fingers point to the DNC and the Kerry camp. Who knows?Amazing what some folks will do to influence and win an election. Politics can be such a dirty game.
When having the choice between Sean Hannity and Michael Moore and who is telling the American people a closer version of truth, I'll take Hannity any day. I'll bet you really think 'Fahrenheit 911' is a real documentary too?
I doubt there will be an "ugly crowd" at Hannity engagement. He's not speaking at the Democratic National Convention. Actually, I liked to see Moore talk. I like hearing different view points even if I may not necassarily agree with the points being expressed. I'd also like to see the crowd at Moore's engagement at UVSC. I doubt it will be ugly but it should be pretty interesting too.
Heres my question to you, Tony. You seem to be calling all these people and organizations bunch of liars. Who, in your modest opinion, is telling the real truth? A small list is sufficient. I'm truly interested to see whom you feel is giving us the "straight scoop". Tightlines, my friend.
[/size][/black][/font]
[signature]
The FOX misquotes were a totally different situation. Fox bellied up to the bar and IMMEDIATELY (the same day), on their own behalf, pull the story, admitting it was bad information. If only Dan Rather and CBS would of been so fair about it instead of trying to shove forged documents down our throats as the truth they might have kept their reputation of reporting the news as credible.
The real question is who fed those documents to CBS? All fingers point to the DNC and the Kerry camp. Who knows?Amazing what some folks will do to influence and win an election. Politics can be such a dirty game.
When having the choice between Sean Hannity and Michael Moore and who is telling the American people a closer version of truth, I'll take Hannity any day. I'll bet you really think 'Fahrenheit 911' is a real documentary too?
I doubt there will be an "ugly crowd" at Hannity engagement. He's not speaking at the Democratic National Convention. Actually, I liked to see Moore talk. I like hearing different view points even if I may not necassarily agree with the points being expressed. I'd also like to see the crowd at Moore's engagement at UVSC. I doubt it will be ugly but it should be pretty interesting too.
Heres my question to you, Tony. You seem to be calling all these people and organizations bunch of liars. Who, in your modest opinion, is telling the real truth? A small list is sufficient. I'm truly interested to see whom you feel is giving us the "straight scoop". Tightlines, my friend.
[/size][/black][/font]
[signature]