Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Another question about fish finders
#20
BLM, did you miss the statement I made in the original post?

"The new Bottom Line Tournament 480 Max has an 480x480 pixel screen, that is something that is good because it shows a big picture and good detail. When combined with 3200 watts of power I should be able to see just about every fish on the bottom of the lake"
My reasoning for dual frequency is that I fish two very different lakes, one that is deep(Bear lake) and one that is shallow(Willard). A 20* cone seems big because of the huge area that it will be covering in 80ft of water. RNL replied to the post by saying it would be better to have a 400kHz transducer for fishing places like Bear lake(or did I not understand what he was saying?) What I really want is a finder that works good for deep water and shallow water, is that possible?
The 480 max looks like the best finder for the price, it has a split screen and cost just $179.99. I need to do a little more research to find out what else it comes with but the only thing that compares for the value is the Matrix 27, it cost $249.99 WH2
[signature]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: [BearLakeMack] Another question about fish finders - by wiperhunter2 - 03-21-2004, 07:54 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)