Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Not sure why this is a good idea
#23
My opinion is that, the plan seems well thought through and reasonable, and cooperation between states natural resource agency is a good thing, and may pay off in the future when Utah will be able to cash in the favor to improve or restore one of its fisheries with Idaho assistance. I tend to trust the biologist who have experience collecting fish this way when they say there will be minimum impact and acceptably low mortality rate. Is it really a 50% morality rate where is that number your citing coming from or is it lower or higher, I don’t recall I may have missed it in the bullet points. What I didn’t miss was 400 fish make up less than 1% of the total population of lake trout over 4 years old and that up to a 10% reduction of fish is undetectable in creel surveys. So In theory they could take many more fish with a really high mortality rate without negatively effecting the fishery. I see no reason to be concerned to the contrary I’m encouraged by interstate cooperation.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Not sure why this is a good idea - by Lundboy54 - 04-27-2021, 02:56 PM
RE: Not sure why this is a good idea - by MACMAN - 04-28-2021, 03:24 AM
RE: Not sure why this is a good idea - by Fritzfishin - 04-28-2021, 07:09 PM
RE: Not sure why this is a good idea - by Majja - 04-28-2021, 08:39 PM
RE: Not sure why this is a good idea - by MACMAN - 04-29-2021, 03:49 AM
RE: Not sure why this is a good idea - by obifishkenobi - 04-29-2021, 04:40 AM
RE: Not sure why this is a good idea - by MACMAN - 04-29-2021, 02:56 PM
RE: Not sure why this is a good idea - by MACMAN - 04-29-2021, 07:21 PM
RE: Not sure why this is a good idea - by MACMAN - 04-29-2021, 11:15 PM
RE: Not sure why this is a good idea - by MACMAN - 04-30-2021, 07:19 PM
RE: Not sure why this is a good idea - by Mildog - 05-01-2021, 11:06 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)