Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
reserved for the few
#12

Hi there johnincolorado,

I'm an old geezer myself thank you... and proud of it. If you visit boards focused on southern California sportfishing, you'll find I'm a fighter and don't give an inch. Especially with it comes to city ordanances limiting access or use of public lands.

What I really meant, but didn't convey properly, is that with less and less people having a link to the outdoors and its activities, there are fewer people willing to listen to us both private citizens and public figures.

Alamo? yep! The only difference is that according to a recent 2 hour special shown on the History Channel on the 'real' Alamo, the Mexican authorities had a good deal of justification for quelling what they saw as treasonous (some of those guys took Mexican citizenship to get bennies and free land) and not a few were outright criminals, speculators (kinda like carpetbaggers) and adventurers!! Of course, there were decent and rightious people too. The bad guys in our situation have no rightous case against us or honest intentions. That's for sure

JapanRon
[signature]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
reserved for the few - by johnincolorado - 02-03-2004, 05:58 PM
Re: [Dryrod] reserved for the few - by patches - 02-07-2004, 03:48 AM
Re: [johnincolorado] reserved for the few - by JapanRon - 02-05-2004, 07:12 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)