Posts: 11
	Threads: 0
	Joined: Sep 2009
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
	
	
		what is better? Berkley vanish fluorocarbon     or the
Berkley trilene better are they both invisible underwater, does one strech less then the other?
thanks
[signature]
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 10
	Threads: 0
	Joined: Mar 2009
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
	
	
		berkely vanish flourocarben
[signature]
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 193
	Threads: 0
	Joined: Jul 2006
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
	
	
		Are we talking about a Berkley Trilene Fluorocarbon, or just the trileine mono?
[signature]
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 199
	Threads: 0
	Joined: Apr 2008
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
	
	
		I tried them both and its a toss up for me.  Vanish seems to be more brittle and prone to breaking.  The 100% Fluoro in the gold package seems really wiry and stiff to me but its definitely stronger than the Vanish.  Any 100% fluorocarbon line will be invisible under water.  
 
Try Seaguar Invis-X.  Its around the same price as the Trilene 100% Fluoro (gold pack), maybe cheaper.  I use it on baitcasters, spinning reels... no complaints.  It is a little stiffer than regular mono, but overall it handles well and 8# test is hard to break even when you're stuck on a rock or log and trying to break it off.
[signature]
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 11
	Threads: 0
	Joined: Sep 2009
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
	
	
		ok man thanks alot
[signature]
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 20
	Threads: 0
	Joined: Oct 2009
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
	
	
		I like the Vanish, I use the 4-6lb for dropshotting and also use the heavier one for spinnerbaits and cranks. Very happy with this line and fairly price.
[signature]