Posts: 768
	Threads: 32
	Joined: Aug 2020
	
Reputation: 
18
	 
	
	
		I saw that somewhere awhile back, can't imagine that it's any worse than all the mercury and lead in fish already out here in the west.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 33,244
	Threads: 439
	Joined: Feb 2002
	
Reputation: 
36
	 
	
	
		You could be right but the article makes it seem pretty bad.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 768
	Threads: 32
	Joined: Aug 2020
	
Reputation: 
18
	 
	
	
		Yes it does, and if it's that bad, then there's elevated levels in lots of other foods due to irrigation of crops from contaminated water
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 433
	Threads: 13
	Joined: Jan 2011
	
Reputation: 
6
	 
	
		
		
		02-05-2023, 12:39 AM 
(This post was last modified: 02-05-2023, 12:44 AM by castnshoot.)
		
	 
	
		a textbook case of environmental injustice” in which certain communities are “inordinately harmed.”
Contamination of this food source particularly “threatens those who cannot afford to purchase commercial seafood,” the authors stressed in a statement accompanying the study.
This part of the article makes me have some doubts,, plus they are measuring in parts per trillion.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 33,244
	Threads: 439
	Joined: Feb 2002
	
Reputation: 
36
	 
	
	
		I agree, they are making it sound much worse than it likely actually is.
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 768
	Threads: 32
	Joined: Aug 2020
	
Reputation: 
18
	 
	
	
		Yep, I see Montana is going to do a study on their waterways for here in the near future, be interesting to see what they say.