Should .50 cal be banned? - Printable Version +- Fishing Forum (https://bigfishtackle.com/forum) +-- Forum: General Discussion (https://bigfishtackle.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=334) +--- Forum: Hunting (https://bigfishtackle.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=71) +--- Thread: Should .50 cal be banned? (/showthread.php?tid=129887) |
Should .50 cal be banned? - BEARCLAW - 05-04-2004 I saw this article and wondered what the general consensus would be among hunters? Should the .50 cal be banned for sale to the public? [url "http://washingtontimes.com/national/20040503-103240-2772r.htm"]http://washingtontimes.com/national/20040503-103240-2772r.htm[/url] [signature] Re: [BEARCLAW] Should .50 cal be banned? - DanielJRioux - 05-04-2004 I've used the .50 cal in the military. If somebody wants to own one so be it, but what are they going to use them for? They are big, bulky, and heavy, not really a hunting gun, unless you are hunting tanks! [signature] Re: [DanielJRioux] Should .50 cal be banned? - fish4fish - 05-05-2004 Maybe somebody could use one of those to "encourage" OPEC to produce more oil so that i cna pay less then $2.00 a galon. Or somebody could use them to hunt the ever dangerous low flying airplane [signature] Re: [BEARCLAW] Should .50 cal be banned? - daymere - 05-07-2004 no as i shoot long distance and others do the same and if you start banning where do you stop. [signature] Re: [BEARCLAW] Should .50 cal be banned? - patches - 05-21-2004 [crazy]when ya git right down ot it!I BELIEVE, that whether ya ban em or not, whether ya scan to see who aquired them, check references, or do ALL WE CAN DO, with those rifles, guns, what ever, can git in wrong hands. they want em bad enough, they always find a ways. they sure wont go to no gun store to git em either to go thru the process of gittin a gun like you and i. but i member what gramp said, it,s not the gun, it,s who,s hands it,s in. and i do member that. what ever rifle pistol, gun, it is. even this 50 caliber. and it,s ![]() ![]() [signature] |